The Huda Beauty Trademark Playbook: How One Makeup Artist's Name Became a Portfolio of 58 Filings

A Trademark Is Never Just a Word

Under the federal trademark statute, the Lanham Act, a trademark is a word, name, symbol, or device used to identify and distinguish one party's goods from those of others and to indicate their source.^[13] Notice the anchor in that definition: goods. For service marks, it is services.^[13]

That anchor matters enormously in practice. When you apply to register a mark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, you must identify the specific goods or services the mark is used with, or that you intend to use it with, and those goods and services are organized into classes.^[2][14] A federal registration is prima facie evidence of the owner's exclusive right to use the mark in connection with the goods or services specified in the registration.^[15]

In other words, your trademark rights are shaped by the description of what you sell. Register a name for lipstick, and you have not automatically registered it for a skincare line, an online store, or a masterclass. Each commercial activity deserves its own analysis.

Keep that principle in mind, because it explains nearly every choice in the Huda Beauty portfolio.

A brand that grows in more than one direction

According to the company's own account, Huda Kattan is a trained makeup artist whose content and product expertise developed side by side.^[3] A brand that grows that way is not only a cosmetics manufacturer. It is also a teacher, an entertainer, a retailer, and a service authority.

The trademark records reflect exactly that.

The HUDABEAUTY registration under Serial No. 87976261 covers cosmetics and retail services.^[6] A separate HUDABEAUTY registration, Serial No. 87187995, extends to education, entertainment, and beauty services.^[7] Same name. Different commercial roles. Separate protection.

The newer HUDA record, Serial No. 79418446, goes further. Its listed classes span nine categories: cosmetics, downloadable media and software, printed matter, bags, housewares, apparel, retail, education and entertainment, and beauty services.^[8] (The "79" prefix on the serial number is significant in itself: it is the series the USPTO assigns to requests to extend protection to the United States under the Madrid Protocol, the international treaty system that lets an owner seek protection in multiple countries through a single international registration.^[16])

Here is where precision matters. A trademark filing that lists a class is not evidence that a product in that class has launched. U.S. law allows applicants to file based on a bona fide intention to use a mark in commerce, but registration ultimately requires actual use, shown through a statement of use.^[17] And since the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020, third parties can challenge registrations for goods or services on which a mark was never used, through new expungement and reexamination proceedings.^[18]

So the right lesson from the HUDA filing is not "file in every class you can imagine." It is this: when your brand realistically operates in several commercial lanes, protection should follow each of those lanes.

Memorable product names become assets of their own

Most founders stop after three filings: a company name, a logo, maybe a slogan. Huda Beauty's portfolio takes a different view. It repeatedly treats individual product names as assets worth protecting in their own right.

Consider EASY BAKE, registered for cosmetics under Serial No. 87818432.^[9] It does not stand alone. The portfolio also includes EASY BAKE AND SNATCH, BABY BAKES, and a pending EASY BAKE filing for retail services.^[1] The same pattern appears with FAUXFILTER and several FAUXFILLER applications, and with the pairing of 1 COAT WOW! and HUDABEAUTY 1COAT WOW!

That repetition has a legal name. Courts recognize a "family of marks," which exists when a group of marks shares a recognizable common characteristic and the public associates that shared feature with a single source. In J & J Snack Foods Corp. v. McDonald's Corp., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained that a family is established not simply by owning similar marks, but by using and promoting them together so the common element itself becomes recognized.^[19] Whether any particular Huda Beauty naming group would qualify as a legal family is a fact-specific question the public records alone do not answer. But the strategic instinct is clear: build names that can be extended.

Other names in the portfolio are tied to a vivid product promise or beauty ritual: LEGIT LASHES, POWER BULLET, THIRST TRAP, TANTOUR, LIFE LINER, BLUSH FILTER, STICKY TACK, and BLUR JAM.^[1]

Compare those to a phrase like "setting powder" or "mascara." The difference is not just marketing flair. It is legal strength.

Trademark law sorts marks along a spectrum of distinctiveness first described in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc.: generic, descriptive, suggestive, arbitrary, and fanciful.^[20] Generic terms can never function as trademarks. Merely descriptive terms are refused registration on the Principal Register unless they acquire distinctiveness through use in the marketplace.^[21] Suggestive, arbitrary, and fanciful marks, by contrast, are considered inherently distinctive, a point the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.^[22]

The practical takeaway for any product business: a creative, distinctive product name is generally easier to register and protect than a name that simply describes the product. It is also more memorable, more searchable, and easier to build a family around.

Giving new promises their own identity

Not every name in the portfolio starts with HUDA.

WISHFUL, registered under Serial No. 88978183, protects a separate skincare identity.^[10] Huda Beauty's official account says the Wishful concept grew out of years of audience comments and a perceived demand for simplified skincare.^[4] That sequence is a model worth copying: listen for a specific customer need, build a distinct promise around it, then protect the name that will carry that promise.

GLOWISH, Serial No. 90209658, is another distinct brand signal.^[11] KAYALI and KAY ALI filings show fragrance naming within the portfolio's history.^[1] And DUBAI IN A BOTTLE, Serial No. 99166966, ties product language to a place-based story, with coverage for both cosmetics and retail services.^[12]

Place names deserve a quick legal note. The Lanham Act contains specific provisions for marks that are primarily geographically descriptive or primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of the goods.^[21] Founders drawn to place-based branding should expect an examining attorney to evaluate that question, and should factor it into clearance before investing in packaging.

The strategic principle underneath all of this: the house mark holds the system together, while sub-brand and product marks let individual ideas build equity of their own.

Dead filings have a purpose as well

Fourteen records in the snapshot are dead, including THE OVERACHIEVER CONCEALER, BRO GLOW, VERY VANTA, FREEDOM, and RESTING BOSS FACE.^[1]

It would be a mistake to count these as active rights. It would also be a mistake to read a story into them. A public "dead" status does not reveal the business reason behind it.

What the law does tell us is how filings can die. An application can be refused during examination, for example because of a likelihood of confusion with an earlier registered mark or because the mark is merely descriptive.^[21] It can be opposed by a third party who believes they would be damaged by the registration.^[23] An applicant may simply choose not to proceed. And registrations do not last forever on autopilot: owners must file a declaration of continued use between the fifth and sixth years after registration,^[24] and must renew every ten years.^[25] Separately, the statute provides that nonuse of a mark for three consecutive years is prima facie evidence of abandonment.^[13]

Brand portfolios, in short, are living systems. Names get tested. Priorities shift. Some rights are deliberately let go.

That leads to a discipline every brand owner needs: separate ambition from assertion. A pending application is not a registration. A cancelled registration is not a current right. A portfolio is only as useful as your clarity about which is which.

Build protection around the ways value is actually created

In June 2025, Huda Beauty announced that Kattan had reclaimed full ownership of the company after an eight-year partnership with TSG Consumer.^[5] The announcement did not disclose a valuation, so it would be improper to put a dollar figure on the trademark portfolio.

But the moment illustrates a larger point. When ownership changes hands, when investors conduct diligence, or when a brand licenses its name, the central question is often the same: what exactly does this company own?

The law gives that question real teeth. Under the Lanham Act, a registered mark is assignable only together with the goodwill of the business connected to it.^[26] Applications filed on an intent-to-use basis face an additional restriction: they generally cannot be assigned before use is established, except to a successor to the relevant part of the applicant's business.^[26] And a registration that has been in continuous use for five consecutive years after registration may become "incontestable" upon the proper filing,^[27] a status the Supreme Court held in Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc. cannot be challenged on the ground that the mark is merely descriptive.^[28]

None of that means a trademark filing guarantees financing or a higher valuation. It does not. "Bankable," in the honest sense, means the business has identified and protected the names customers use to find, remember, request, and recommend what it sells, and that those rights are valid, maintained, and aligned with real commercial use. That kind of portfolio is simply easier to understand, easier to diligence, and easier to defend.

Five questions every brand owner should ask

Three trademarks are a starting point, not a strategy

A name, a logo, and a slogan can form a solid foundation. They rarely capture all the value a growing brand creates. Huda Beauty's record shows why owners should also look at signature product names, service lines, educational content, collections, digital experiences, and credible expansion categories.

The goal is not to match another company's filing count. It is to build a portfolio that fits your revenue model, your customers' language, and your growth plan.

This case study is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark status can change. Review the linked USPTO records and consult qualified counsel before making filing or enforcement decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions